Cognitive Conflicts Emerged from Feedback from Peer Assessment and Artificial Intelligence

A Narrative Inquiry in an Indonesian EFL Writing Classroom

  • Khaira Rizqa Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Nur Arifah Drajati Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Kristian Adi Putra Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Abstract

This narrative study explores the cognitive conflicts that pre-service teachers experience during peer-assessment activities in an artificial intelligence (AI) facilitated academic writing course. This study applies a narrative inquiry research design to Indonesian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing classes. Three pre-service teachers pursuing an undergraduate degree in English language education at an Indonesian public university were recruited. The data were obtained from participants' stories, follow-up semi-structured interviews, and photos as an artifact to complete the data. The data was then analysed thematically. The participants’ cognitive conflict experiences were gathered during process writing and peer assessment. The findings show that the cognitive conflicts experienced by the participants were mostly from old myths and false beliefs. It brings advantages to pre-service teachers. The cognitive conflicts support the critical thinking of pre-service teachers. They discussed the material in detail, explored the different ideas, and helped them to confirm the incorrect knowledge and misunderstanding among them. This finding also implies the need for pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, and teacher educators to critically consider the cognitive conflicts in an L2 writing classroom, particularly in madrasah tsanawiyah (junior high schools), madrasah aliyah (senior high schools) and higher education institutions contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Rezavied, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th editio). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
[2] Baker, K. M. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654794
[3] Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative Inquiry In Language Teaching And Learning Research. Routledge.
[4] Fathi, J., & Khodabakhsh, M. R. (2020). Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment in Writing Course of Iranian EFL Students: An Investigation of Writing Anxiety. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 8(1), 88–96.
[5] Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[6] Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers and Education, 137, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005
[7] Gabriel, F., Marrone, R., Van Sebille, I., Kovanovic, V., & Laat de, M. (2022). Digital education strategies around the world: practices and policies. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 85–106.
[8] Gillett, A., Hammond, A., & Martala, M. (2009). Successful Academic Writing. Longman.
[9] Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of Metacognitif in Education. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
[10] Idris, A., Ion, G., & Seery, A. (2019). Peer learning in international higher education : the experience of international students in an Irish university. Irish Educational Studies, 38(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1489299
[11] Ikhwan, A. (2018). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam: Memahami Prinsip Dasar. CV. Diandra Kreatif.
[12] Ikhwan, A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Dasar (Mengenal Model Penelitian dan Sistematikanya). STAI Muhammadiyah Tulungagung.
[13] Ikhwan, A. (2022). Manajemen Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. In Najaha. Najaha.
[14] Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44(February), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
[15] Langfeldt, L., & Kyvik, S. (2015). Intrinsic tensions and future challenges of peer review. Riksbankens Jubileumsfond & Makadam Publishers.
[16] Lee, Y. J. (2020). The long-term effect of automated writing evaluation feedback on writing development. English Teaching(South Korea), 75(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.1.202003.67
[17] Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
[18] Lin, C. J. (2019). An online peer assessment approach to supporting mind-mapping flipped learning activities for college English writing courses. In Journal of Computers in Education (Vol. 6, Issue 3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00144-6
[19] Liu, H., & Brantmeier, C. (2019). “I know English”: Self-assessment of foreign language reading and writing abilities among young Chinese learners of English. System, 80, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.013
[20] Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 81–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.05.001
[21] Stephanou, G., & Karamountzos, D. (2020). Enhancing Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge, Metacognitive Regulation and Performance in Physical Education via TGFU. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.12691/rpbs-8-1-1
[22] Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003
[23] Topping, K. J. (2018). Student Assessment For Educators. In Using Peer Assessment to Inspire Reflection and Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256889
[24] Yang, Y. F. (2010). Cognitive conflicts and resolutions in online text revisions: Three profiles. Educational Technology and Society, 13(4), 202–214.
[25] Yao, Y., Wang, W., & Yang, X. (2021). Perceptions of the inclusion of Automatic Writing Evaluation in peer assessment on EFL writers’ language mindsets and motivation: A short-term longitudinal study. Assessing Writing, 50(September), 100568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100568
[26] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 2–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
[27] Zhai, Y., & Lu, W. (2020). Tracing the evolution of AI : conceptualization of arti fi cial intelligence in mass media discourse. Information Discovery and Delivery, 48(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-01-2020-0007
[28] Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417
Published
2022-12-18
How to Cite
RIZQA, Khaira; DRAJATI, Nur Arifah; PUTRA, Kristian Adi. Cognitive Conflicts Emerged from Feedback from Peer Assessment and Artificial Intelligence. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 127-139, dec. 2022. ISSN 2599-3046. Available at: <https://alhayat.or.id/index.php/alhayat/article/view/256>. Date accessed: 27 jan. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v6i2.256.